Revised RFC on range design for D2

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Jason House wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> 
>> In wake of the many excellent comments and suggestions made here, I
>> made one more pass through the draft proposal for ranges.
>> 
>> http://ssli.ee.washington.edu/~aalexand/d/tmp/std_range.html
>> 
>> There are some comments in red illustrating some uncertainties (not
>>  all), and the names of the primitives have been updated. Bicycle
>> shed galore! But don't forget to comment on the reactor as well
>> :o).
> 
> The colorful diagram is nice, but it doesn't belong at the top of the
> article.  Is it possible to find a better spot?  It may be best
> following the "Coding with ranges also has disadvatages" paragraph.

I agree. I just plopped it in there in an intermediate revision and left
it there. Moved it now.

> PS: You're missing an n in disadvantages.  I read past it several
> times, but my spell checker caught it.

Thanks, fixed. I keep on hoping someone develops a simple way for emacs 
to spellcheck comments...


Andrei