Code Poet, an IDE for D

[Anders Bergh]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:34, Walter Bright <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
>>
>> I thought (I'm not 100% sure on either of these counts) that:
>>
>> 1.  We don't want anything in Phobos that requires attribution for works
>> distributed exclusively in binary form, even if the license is otherwise
>> permissive.  This means we can't use BSD-licensed code in Phobos.
>
> Right.
>
>> 2.  Creative commons isn't entirely clear about whether attribution would
>> be
>> required for stuff distributed in pure binary form.
>
> Hmm. That would be a problem.
>

I would assume only the documentation is cc-licensed, as far as I can
remember all of Go was released using the MIT license or similar.

-- 
Anders Bergh