dmd 1.062 and 2.047 release

BCS none at anon.com
Tue Jun 15 16:21:37 PDT 2010


Hello Walter,

> strtr wrote:
> 
>> It's the optimization :)
>> Without -O compilation took only a few seconds!
> Well, that explains it! Little attempt is made in the optimizer to
> make it compile faster if that would interfere with generating faster
> code.
> 

How does 1.061 w/ -O compare to 1.062 w/ -O? If 62 is much slower that might 
be of interest.

-- 
... <IXOYE><





More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list