DDebber Request for Review

[Lutger]

Jesse Phillips wrote:

> Lutger wrote:
> 
>>
>> You could try getting LDC with Tango into debian, there are no license
>> problems with them.
> 
> My goal isn't exactly to get anything into the official repo. This is my
> first time really doing packaging and I'd like to figure out what is
> best for D. The conflicts between v1, v2, Phobos, and Tango coupled
> with the packages depending on one or another, or any combination...
> makes packaging very unclear.

Yes and that's exactly why this is a fine project, though getting in an 
official repo will be extra valuable. I might attempt it for fedora when, if 
ever, I get to finish my current projects. 

Is there any userbase for D1 without Tango at the moment? I'd think there is 
only the combination D1 plus Tango with gdc/ldc/dmd, and D2 with dmd getting 
any use to speak of. dmd is not redistributable and ldc seems to be more 
actively developed, so that's why I suggested that combo.