dcollections 1.0 and 2.0a beta released

[Alex Makhotin]

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> 
> I myself don't really use the interface aspect of the classes, it is mostly a carryover from the Java/Tango inspirations.  But I can see one good reason to keep them -- binary interoperability.  For example, it might be the case some day when D has good support with dynamic libraries that a library exposes some piece of itself as a Map or List interface.
> 

Hi, Steven.
You made a good point on interoperability.
Strict, precise, readable, interfaces, that's what I would like in the 
really good standard library for D.
But, is D mature enough to this kind of possibilities, considering, at 
least, known bugs involving interfaces?
I don't even feel myself free to use interfaces in my code because of 
undefined behavior it may cause.
Shared libraries...
Is this going to happen on Linux?
When?

-- 
Alex Makhotin,
the founder of BITPROX,
http://bitprox.com