Dscanner - It exists

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-08-01 22:20, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> If you want really good performance out of a range-based solution operating on
> ranges of dchar, then you need to special case for the built-in string types
> all over the place, and if you have to wrap them in other range types
> (generally because of calling another range-based function), then there's a
> good chance that you will indeed get a performance hit. D's range-based
> approach is really nice from the perspective of usability, but you have to
> work at it a bit if you want it to be efficient when operating on strings. It
> _can_ be done though.

Is it really worth it though? Most use cases will just be with regular 
strings?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg