std.log review suspended

Johannes Pfau nospam at example.com
Tue Mar 13 11:18:31 PDT 2012


Am Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:07:01 +0100
schrieb "David Nadlinger" <see at klickverbot.at>:

> The extended review period for std.log has ended [1], and Jose, 
> the author of the proposed module, has requested some extra time 
> to incorporate the suggestions made during the review without 
> ending up with a butchered design. Thus, the review process has 
> been suspended as to not block the queue for too long.
> 
> This also means that review can start on the next proposal 
> immediately. From the records, std.uuid would be next – are we 
> good to go, Johannes? Other suggestions?

Give me a day or two. A recent change to dmd/phobos broke some of the
unittests, I'll fix those first.

> 
> On a related note, I created a Trello card to keep track of 
> review manager volunteers. So, if you are interested, please add 
> yourself to it so that the next review can start smoothly 
> (»Phobos Review Queue« board, request access at the Phobos ML).
> 
> As always, thanks to everybody who participated,
> David
> 
> 
> [1] Or will end in a few hours, depending on how you interpret 
> the messed-up date I had given in the announcement. Since this is 
> not a vote anyway, I also didn't specify a time zone, so…




More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list