D 2.062 release

[Maxim Fomin]

On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:55:39 UTC, David Nadlinger 
wrote:
> On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:07:58 UTC, Leandro Lucarella 
> wrote:
>> Again, the problem is making the changelog update optional! No 
>> pull
>> request should be merged if it doesn't include a proper 
>> changelog entry,
>> that's how it's done.
>
> We tried that in the past, and it lead to tons of merging 
> errors. They are easy to resolve manually, of course, but still 
> very annoying because this breaks the GitHub "Merge" button.
>
> David

Than maybe don't include changelog entry in a pull, but require 
that it is supplied with pull description as text, so that 
whoever mergers pull, separately pushes it to the branch? I would 
be nice if auto-tester could handle it automatically.