code.dlang.org now supports categories and search - license information now required

[ponce]

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 13:26:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2013-10-17 14:06, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>
>> If you have per-file differences, then this in fact means that 
>> both
>> licenses need to be obeyed when using the package.
>
> Not necessarily. There can be two completely separated targets, 
> that don't share any code. I don't know if that's possible in 
> Dub, but in theory it would be.

I have an example of such a thing, but honestly I don't think dub 
should go that much far. Just providing the superset of what 
licenses a package _might_ fall under is already useful.