dmd 2.065 beta 3

[extrawurst]

On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 03:37:52 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 10:24 PM, extrawurst wrote:
>> I gave beta 3 on my win32 dev machine a try today and noticed 
>> that
>> building vibe.d (a dependancy in almost all my projects) takes
>> noticeably longer to built. observing the process shows that 
>> beta3
>> consumes almost 1.5GB of RAM while dmd 2.064 'just' uses 1GB.
>
> Is this optimized?
>
> I had the impression that compiling diet templates in optimized 
> builds now takes much longer, but I might be wrong.

No no optimization enabled and I am also not using any diet 
templates. It happens here on win32 even with the smallest 
example that vibe.d provides...