std.signal : voting results

[Kagamin]

On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 09:26:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> As an additional comment I wonder if existing signal module 
> should be deprecated and removed completely from Phobos even 
> desite lack of replacement. It sits in the very same niche as 
> this proposal and has even worse implementation with plenty of 
> reported bugs. It becomes hard to justify it at this point.

One possibility is a warning about issues and link to the dub 
package in the docs for std.signal with a hint, that it may be a 
better choise. Probably same for std.xml. Do we have a package 
with better xml?