Mono-D v1.7.2 - Again internal refactorings, less completion bugs
Alexander Bothe
info at alexanderbothe.com
Tue Mar 18 04:28:24 PDT 2014
On Tuesday, 18 March 2014 at 10:04:27 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> I've given Mono-D the first serious try recently (I'm using a
> simple Sublime Text setup usually) and it was a really pleasant
> experience. Apart from the code completion and the DUB
> integration, which is of course awesome to have, some features
> like the integrated compare/blame/merge views are also nice
> productivity boosters.
>
> Good to see progress on the auto completion, as that was the
> only thing that still was a little annoying - annoying just
> because it usually works so well that you quickly come to rely
> on it and thus also immediately notice when it fails. There is
> probably some kind of "uncanny valley" there, where it either
> has to be perfect, or very sketchy (based on text buffers) to
> be comfortable to use.
This is basically a very situation-dependent thing, as it
sometimes is just not able to deduce the currrently initialized
type, although I've already built-in recognition pass-throughs if
template parameters couldn't be satisfied.
I've also made hard-coded Tuple completion available - and
although this might not be the best idea, it's actually a big
leap forward even without having to spend too much time on
deducing each template (or handling CTFE - this is still a thing
I don't want to touch atm).
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list