Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"

[Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 03/26/2015 04:38 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> I paraphrase the common theme thus:  Go is
> successful in the market, D isn't, therefore Go is a better language
> than D.

I love how Go's very own reasoning there naturally suggests that PHP, 
C++, and Java must all be vastly superior to Go.