Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"

[weaselcat via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 01:47:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/26/2015 12:40 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce 
> wrote:
>> (Almost) All publicity is good publicity.
>
>
> I attended a presentation at NWCPP on Go last week. I have 
> never written a Go program, so filter my opinion on that.
>
> It seems to me that every significant but one feature of Go has 
> a pretty much direct analog in D, i.e. you can write "Go" code 
> in D much like you can write "C" code in D.
>
> The one difference was Go's support for green threads. There's 
> no technical reason why D can't have green threads, it's just 
> that nobody has written the library code to do it.

vibe has (experimental?) green threads, doesn't it?
I don't keep up with vibe, so I may be wrong.