Release vibe.d 0.7.27
Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Sun Feb 14 00:17:34 PST 2016
Am 11.02.2016 um 00:24 schrieb sigod:
> Did some benchmarks between `std.net.curl.get` and
> `vibe.http.client.requestHTTP`. Only GET requests.
>
> 100 requests, ~1.4mb file:
>
> curl total: 131304, average: 1 sec and 313 ms
> vibe total: 21975, average: 219 ms
>
> 52 different files:
>
> curl total: 24851, average: 477 ms
> vibe total: 11290, average: 217 ms
>
> 50 different files (excluded 2 of the biggest ones):
>
> curl total: 20892, average: 417 ms
> vibe total: 11368, average: 227 ms
>
> (Looks like `std.net.curl.get` doesn't like if file is bigger than ~1mb.)
>
> Is vibe.d's API really that fast? Or am I doing something wrong?
How fast was the network connection in that case? Could it make a
difference if keep-alive connections are used or not? Were the requests
done in parallel or in sequence? I certainly wouldn't expect curl to be
slower for a simple sequential transfer of a single file, but who knows.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list