Release vibe.d 0.7.27

[sigod via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 14 February 2016 at 08:17:34 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 11.02.2016 um 00:24 schrieb sigod:
>> Did some benchmarks between `std.net.curl.get` and
>> `vibe.http.client.requestHTTP`. Only GET requests.
>>
>> 100 requests, ~1.4mb file:
>>
>>      curl total: 131304, average: 1 sec and 313 ms
>>      vibe total:  21975, average: 219 ms
>>
>> 52 different files:
>>
>>      curl total: 24851, average: 477 ms
>>      vibe total: 11290, average: 217 ms
>>
>> 50 different files (excluded 2 of the biggest ones):
>>
>>      curl total: 20892, average: 417 ms
>>      vibe total: 11368, average: 227 ms
>>
>> (Looks like `std.net.curl.get` doesn't like if file is bigger 
>> than ~1mb.)
>>
>> Is vibe.d's API really that fast? Or am I doing something 
>> wrong?
>
> How fast was the network connection in that case? Could it make 
> a difference if keep-alive connections are used or not? Were 
> the requests done in parallel or in sequence? I certainly 
> wouldn't expect curl to be slower for a simple sequential 
> transfer of a single file, but who knows.

https://gist.github.com/sigod/c78c61ac6118fa9fda26

I'm getting something like this:

	HTTPS:
	curl total: 23401, average: 458ms
	vibe total: 12136, average: 237ms
	HTTP:
	curl total: 5577, average: 278ms
	vibe total: 4268, average: 213ms

Windows 7 x86, dmd 2.070.0