Battle-plan for CTFE

[Uplink_Coder via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 13:51:55 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
> wrote:
>>
>> That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it 
>> will be allowed as dependency for DMD.
>>
>> ---
>> Dmitry Olshansky
>
> LLVM is purely optional.
> A pure D interpreter exists.
>
> LLVM optimises most ctfe btw and returns constants.

If anyone want to take a look the lastest llvm_backend 
development is happening here :
https://github.com/UplinkCoder/dmd/blob/_ctfe/src/bc_llvm_backend.d