DIP Draft Reviews

[Dukc]

On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 11:18:25 UTC, Nicholas Wilson 
wrote:
> I can understand not requiring authors to respond to all the 
> feedback, but not requiring them to respond to _any_ is just 
> wasting everyone's time, since _all_ of the previous points 
> will be bought up again and the next stage will be a repeat of 
> the previous.

Yeah, I agree that if nothing or almost nothing is addressed 
(even by explaining why the raised issues didn't convince) that 
should prevent the DIP from moving forward.