DIP Draft Reviews

[Nicholas Wilson]

On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 10:49:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I always ask DIP authors about unaddressed feedback before 
> moving from one stage to the other, and I did so with DIP 1017 
> when moving out of Draft Review. It's entirely up to the author 
> whether or not to address it and there is no requirement for 
> DIP authors to respond to any feedback. I would prefer it if 
> they did, especially in the Post-Community stage and later as 
> it helps me with my review summaries, but 1017 is not the first 
> DIP where feedback went unaddressed and I'm sure it won't be 
> the last.

I can understand not requiring authors to respond to all the 
feedback, but not requiring them to respond to _any_ is just 
wasting everyone's time, since _all_ of the previous points will 
be bought up again and the next stage will be a repeat of the 
previous.