DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

Adam D. Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Fri May 22 15:28:21 UTC 2020


On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 13:57:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> The DIP review process is not intended for community approval 
> or rejection of DIPs. It's not a democratic voting process.

The community needs to unite and fix this. It is an ineffectual 
process that leads to worse results for the language and further 
poisons the relationship between us.

A small voting review committee solves these problems.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list