(Oh My) Gentool 0.1.0
Gavin Ray
user at example.com
Sat Apr 17 17:23:00 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 15 April 2021 at 16:31:01 UTC, evilrat wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 April 2021 at 13:36:00 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
>> https://forum.dlang.org/post/kofkrulquprdedolczbi@forum.dlang.org
>>
>> On Saturday, 2 February 2019 at 09:41:42 UTC, evilrat wrote:
>>> (Oh My) Gentool - Yet another C/C++ binding generator.
>>>
>>> This release has few changes and tweaks, the most important
>>> one is the ability to process templated functions/methods on
>>> Windows and reduction of missing linker symbols numbers.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Why haven't I heard of this?
>
> I haven't been that active for quite long time, and I didn't
> write announces that often.
>
> After first public release I estimated popularity, and it seems
> only 3-5 people have interest in such stuff, assuming 1k active
> forum users that reads it on every day basis it seems there
> isn't that much people who has any touch on making C++
> bindings, D/C++ interop, or anything related.
>
> But I still do major release announcements anyway.
This is far and away one of the best translation tools I've used
not only for D, but in general. **Amazing!**
Deserves a good deal of attention IMO.
**I hope I can find the time this weekend to get a few examples
of realistic usecases for header translation (large, production
libraries/programs) to be able to do a comparative analysis of
the available tools in the ecosystem for C/C++ -> D conversion.**
(It's not very useful to hand-wavily talk about things without
objective data)
What I can say is that I've had stellar results with Ohmygentool.
(Also use/have used d++, the VisualD C++ converter, cpp2d, and
SWIG).
> SWIG's D generator with the "Directors" feature enabled is
> decent too for anyone not aware of it's existence, though it's
> super fickle to get working
---
I wonder if there are enough people interested in this problem in
the community to form a **Special Interest Group on C++
integration and auto-bindgen/translation**?
Personally I'm not so much interested in conversion of any C/C++
method body code, but just `extern (C++)` type signatures.
In an ideal world, I'd love to be able to decide to start using D
in any C++ project and it's nothing more than one command & some
configuration and/or generating a `compile_commands.json`.
Or be able to leverage all of the C++ ecosystem by using
`vcpkg`/`conan` etc to fetch the library, and then having the D
bindings autogenerated. That would essentially make C++'s tooling
and ecosystem into D's tooling and ecosystem.
Possibly a pipe dream but maybe worth burning a good many nights
and weekends if there's a path forward.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list