Preparing for the New DIP Process

[zjh]

On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 12:53:22 UTC, zjh wrote:
> `Class level private`, increasing one's own selectivity.
> Adding `redundancy` has always been what Walter hopes for, 
> `hasn't` it?

Moreover, `modules, classes, and variables` private are 
considered complete.
I don't understand why just drop out `class level private` ? Just 
because this is a C++approach, it appears to be the same as C++ 
`without any style`?