stupid errors

debugger debugger_member at pathlink.com
Mon Mar 20 16:44:29 PST 2006


Derek Parnell says...
>> this kind of bug is @!*$ and I am not interested in wasting my time
>I just tried this using dmd v.150 and Windows XP and it works fine.

Lucky you. But I am really not interested in wasting my time by working in a
buggy language nor by cutting my source down to the essential raising that bug.

In fact the control flow took even the wrong path:

switch( value){
case SOMECONST:
assert( false); // not executed
break;
case SOMEOTHERCONST:
assert( value == SOMEOTHERCONST); // failed
}






More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list