stupid errors

[Regan Heath]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:44:29 +0000 (UTC), debugger  
<debugger_member at pathlink.com> wrote:
> Derek Parnell says...
>>> this kind of bug is @!*$ and I am not interested in wasting my time
>> I just tried this using dmd v.150 and Windows XP and it works fine.
>
> Lucky you. But I am really not interested in wasting my time by working  
> in a
> buggy language nor by cutting my source down to the essential raising  
> that bug.
>
> In fact the control flow took even the wrong path:
>
> switch( value){
> case SOMECONST:
> assert( false); // not executed
> break;
> case SOMEOTHERCONST:
> assert( value == SOMEOTHERCONST); // failed
> }

It's your loss. Can you please at least post the code here so we can  
figure out whats going on.

Regan