The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs
      October 2008 Archives by date
      
      Starting: Wed Oct  1 03:28:19 PDT 2008
         Ending: Fri Oct 31 15:19:09 PDT 2008
         Messages: 225
     
- [Issue 2381] Minor mistakes in DDoc comments of std.path.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed	elements
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2381] Minor mistakes in DDoc comments of std.path.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2382] New: spec is not clear on what is allowed as	global/static initializers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] New: default arguments can implicitly access private	global variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2384] New: abi spec is unclear on parameter passing
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2378] Win32 OPTLINK crashes when it links some kind of static	library into a executeable.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2384] abi spec is unclear on parameter passing
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2381] Minor mistakes in DDoc comments of std.path.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2379] CTFE fails unless it is very straightforward
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed	elements
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2385] New: spec says all structs are returned via hidden	pointer on linux, but it uses registers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2378] Win32 OPTLINK crashes when it links some kind of static	library into a executeable.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2386] New: Array of forward referenced struct doesn't compile
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed	elements
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2377] ICE with wrong return type for templated method:	template.c:784
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 929] Resizing array of associative arrays (uint[char[]][])	causes infinite loop / hang
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed	elements
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer is not documented
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer is not documented
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2387] New: Static array terminology
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2162] Access violation when threads run closures
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2388] New: type of NaN given by real.nan not specified
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2388] type of NaN given by real.nan not specified
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer is not documented
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2389] New: void* vs. object type overloading fails
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2390] New: Missing warning on conversion from int to char
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2376] CTFE fails on array literal of array literals of chars
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2391] New: Character array literals are not recognized as	string literals
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2376] CTFE fails on array literal of array literals of chars
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2374] (exp).Fn() fail assuming that exp is a type
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2391] Character array literals are not recognized as string	literals
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null giving	bad error message
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2374] (exp).Fn() fail assuming that exp is a type
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2392] New: Parsing ambiguity between function pointer	declaration and function call
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null giving	bad error message
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2369] is(T == function) does not recognize function pointers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2393] New: IFTI regression on (T:char)(T[]) vs (T:dchar)(T[])
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2369] is(T == function) does not recognize function pointers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2392] Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration	and function call
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- No subject
 
- No subject
 
- No subject
 
- No subject
 
- [Issue 2366] Const member function syntax is missing
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2394] New: IFTI fails for nulls
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2388] type of NaN given by real.nan not specified
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2395] New: spec does not document struct forward declarations	(declaring opaque struct type)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2395] spec does not document struct forward declarations	(declaring opaque struct type)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2396] New: -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop	of large array of structs
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2396] -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of	large array of structs
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2396] -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of	large array of structs
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2397] New: wrong file name in error after #line
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2396] -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of	large array of structs
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2398] New: writef("%x") for a pointer is always uppercase
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1635] DirEntry.isfile() and DirEntry.isdir() broken
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2399] New: ICE on casting function to delegate
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2400] New: return const proposals
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2400] return const proposals
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2401] New: type definition conflicts with itself imported	through different module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2402] New: Type is not found if accessed via renamed import
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2403] New: Ice on function pointer type forward declaration
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2405] New: std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2406] New: Declarator2 definition error
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2403] Ice on function pointer type forward declaration
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2392] Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration	and function call
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2407] New: function pointer as an enum's base type doesn't work
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2408] New: class declared as invariant cannot have static	methods
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2409] New: property is not called
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2410] New: array's invariant storage class dropped by a	template
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2411] New: Reference Tuple Foreach
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2412] New: Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2095] covariance w/o typechecks = bugs
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2413] New: getche differs from getch unexpectedly
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2036] Hiding rules too restrictive
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2036] Hiding rules too restrictive
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2306] Scope for dynamic arrays should free memory.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2414] New: enum is dynamically evaluated, yum
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2414] enum is dynamically evaluated, yum
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2415] New: DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2257] Template value parameters behave like alias parameters
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition
 
Don
- [Issue 2416] New: Slice of typedef'ed array should preserve the	typedef'ed type
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] New: protected base member is not available via base	hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2416] Slice of typedef'ed array should preserve the typedef'ed	type
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2418] New: Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten	(unlike array literals)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten	(unlike array literals)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten	(unlike array literals)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten	(unlike array literals)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten	(unlike array literals)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten	(unlike array literals)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- Thread.getThis()
 
John C
- Thread.getThis()
 
Denis Koroskin
- [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten	(unlike array literals)
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2419] New: Thread.getThis() broken?
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers
 
Sergey Gromov
- [Issue 2420] New: mixins are not considered in ddoc
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2420] mixins are not considered in ddoc
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2414] New: enum is dynamically evaluated, yum
 
Bruno Medeiros
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde	in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2422] New: Type is turned into type tuple in variadic template
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
Don
- [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
Lars Ivar Igesund
- [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
Lars Ivar Igesund
- [Issue 2424] New: std.functional binaryRevertArgs : "revert" should	be "reverse"
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1229] Linker fills disk
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2340] Template properties don't work
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2368] Calling a function with an address of another function,	then calling a returned object is rejected
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2373] freebsd select does not accept values  > 999,999
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2376] CTFE fails on array literal of array literals of chars
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static	initializer is not documented
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global	variables that are not visible at call site
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2385] spec says all structs are returned via hidden pointer on	linux, but it uses registers
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2390] Missing warning on conversion from int to char
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2365] compilation error: static const array in struct
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2345] Return by reference should be allowed
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2332] Initializing const or invariant hashes croaks
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2333] Hash initializer does not work
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2336] link to nonexistent std_array.html
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2341] Double destruction without intervening copy
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2362] Confusing description of 'aliasing of invariant with	mutable'?
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2366] Const member function syntax is missing
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2363] Spurious () required after function name when used with	array in prefix form
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2404] std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2405] std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2405] std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2425] New: second "interface" should be invariant
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2425] second "interface" should be invariant
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1645] can override base class' const method with non-const	method
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 929] Resizing array of associative arrays (uint[char[]][])	causes infinite loop / hang
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2426] New: Assertion failure: 'type' on line 6308 in file	'expression.c'
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2426] New: Assertion failure: 'type' on line 6308 in file	'expression.c'
 
ore-sama
- [Issue 2320] ABI spec has contradictory information
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2427] New: Function call in struct initializer fails to compile
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2427] Function call in struct initializer fails to compile
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2428] New: Accessing item in enum'd array produced compiler	error
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2429] New: std.stream.File incorrect flag parsing and sharing	mode
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1986] Mixin code from website doesn't compile
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 1727] Associate Array Literals regression
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2017] Dynamic array creation
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2416] Slice of typedef'ed array should preserve the typedef'ed	type
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2351] enum with no members allowed
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2430] New: Internal error: ..\ztc\evalu8.c 2093
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2431] New: Internal error: ../ztc/cgcod.c 1031 when using -O
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2427] Function call in struct initializer fails to compile
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2427] Function call in struct initializer fails to compile
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)
 
Charles Hixson
- [Issue 2432] New: complex alias -> mtype.c:125: virtual Type*	Type::syntaxCopy(): Assertion `0' failed.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2432] complex alias -> mtype.c:125: virtual Type*	Type::syntaxCopy(): Assertion `0' failed.
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)
 
ore-sama
- dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)
 
Steven Schveighoffer
- dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)
 
BCS
- [Issue 2336] link to nonexistent std_array.html
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2433] New: Assertion failure: 't->deco' on line 604 in file	'mtype.c'
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2434] New: Compiler generates code that does not pass with -w	for some array operations
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2435] New: Assertion failure: 'i < parameters->dim' on line	784 in file 'template.c'
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- Bug using dynamicaly loaded function ?
 
Vermi
- Bug using dynamicaly loaded function ?
 
Vermi
- [Issue 2436] New: Unexpected OPTLINK termination
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2436] Unexpected OPTLINK termination
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2436] Unexpected OPTLINK termination
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
- [Issue 2437] New: ICE - Assertion failure: default struct argument
 
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    
      Last message date: 
       Fri Oct 31 15:19:09 PDT 2008
    Archived on: Fri Oct 31 15:20:03 PDT 2008
    
   
     
     
     This archive was generated by
     Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).