[Issue 7019] implicit constructors are inconsistently allowed

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7019



--- Comment #5 from Trass3r <mrmocool at gmx.de> 2012-01-26 19:33:22 CET ---
I vote for doing the opposite of C++ and introducing a @implicit tag for
constructors that are to be used in the fashion I depicted.
We really need an easy way to finely control implicit conversions.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------