The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

December 2020 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Dec 1 02:20:11 UTC 2020
Ending: Thu Dec 31 12:24:33 UTC 2020
Messages: 345

• [Issue 10286] Better optimization for struct constructors?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10445] add .min, .max, etc. properties for vector types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10445] add .min, .max, etc. properties for vector types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10445] add .min, .max, etc. properties for vector types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10445] add .min, .max, etc. properties for vector types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10445] add .min, .max, etc. properties for vector types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10636] Vector calling convention for D?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10738] double2 ^^ 2 and double2 ^^ 3 are missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10884] Support for using alias expressions to shorten inferred function types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10926] Wrong expression printed when ternary operator used as lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11274] Use a CDN for dlang.org   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11717] CTFE: non-constant value with array and vector ops.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12288] delegate literals should be allowed as class members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12288] delegate literals should be allowed as class members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12635] Accepts Invalid Segment Prefix on Branch Instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12878] inline asm memory operand always uses 64-bit addressing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13828] std.random not @nogc aware   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13828] std.random not @nogc aware   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14196] opApply and nothrow don't play along   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14196] opApply and nothrow don't play along   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14541] "duplicate COMDAT" linker error with the template forward reference in Tuple.opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14896] x64 synchronized problem when using -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15225] cannot overload directly aliased function literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15225] cannot overload directly aliased function literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15435] std.numeric FFTs are not nothrow @nogc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15873] In order to implement std.simd, compile time info about CPU specifics is needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15950] Wish: __compressed_import("file.ext");   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16045] Unable to loading global variables in inline assembly with -fPIC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16465] Template alias does not get unwrapped in templated functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16481] invalid code accepted leading to linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16486] Compiler see template alias like a separate type in template function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16497] suboptimal moves between SSE registers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16497] suboptimal moves between SSE registers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1653] Be able to use template aliases to deduce implicit template parameters.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16681] ICE 1662   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16681] ICE 1662   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17007] let std.math work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17105] [ICE] SIMD Internal error with optimizations: backend\cod3.c 6807   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17105] [ICE] SIMD Internal error with optimizations: backend\cod3.c 6807   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17105] [ICE] SIMD Internal error with optimizations: backend\cod3.c 6807   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17105] [ICE] SIMD Internal error with optimizations: backend\cod3.c 6807   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17105] [ICE] SIMD Internal error with optimizations: backend\cod3.c 6807   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17106] [ICE] SIMD Internal error with optimizations: Internal error: backend\cgcod.c 1666   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17106] [ICE] SIMD Internal error with optimizations: Internal error: backend\cgcod.c 1666   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17244] Undefined comparison of struct arrays is allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17244] Undefined comparison of struct arrays is allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17854] Suboptimal code generated with constants and SSE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1807] ENHANCEMENT: Let IFTI "see through" templates to simple aliases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1807] ENHANCEMENT: Let IFTI "see through" templates to simple aliases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18826] [inline asm] Wrongcode for mov   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18865] Add x86 SIMD Intrinsics to druntime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18867] backend/cgcod.c crash on assignment to vector element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18867] backend/cgcod.c crash on assignment to vector element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18867] backend/cgcod.c crash on assignment to vector element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19091] __traits(compiles) and error in templated structs leads to missing symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19091] __traits(compiles) and error in templated structs leads to missing symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19365] Allow aliasing templated functions from mixin template to add them to overload set   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19365] Allow aliasing templated functions from mixin template to add them to overload set   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1942] ENHANCEMENT: issue 1807 should apply to is-expressions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19443] core.simd generates incorrect code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19443] core.simd generates incorrect code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19443] core.simd generates incorrect code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19545] __traits(compiles, X) false positive, further uses of X succeed but don't link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19590] __traits allMembers should put fully qualified names for imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19599] Wrong codegen DMD x86_64 with both -O and -inline + double   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19599] Wrong codegen DMD x86_64 with both -O and -inline + double   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19599] Wrong codegen DMD x86_64 with both -O and -inline + double   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19599] Wrong codegen DMD x86_64 with both -O and -inline + double   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19632] [SIMD] Error: invalid foreach aggregate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19632] [SIMD] Error: invalid foreach aggregate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19632] [SIMD] Error: invalid foreach aggregate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19632] [SIMD] Error: invalid foreach aggregate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19783] Fail to emplace struct with betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19783] Fail to emplace struct with betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19783] Fail to emplace struct with betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19788] compiler crash on slicing a enum typed as vector   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19788] compiler crash on slicing a enum typed as vector   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19940] core.simd.{load,store}Unaligned functions do not support 32-byte vectors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20041] CTFE incorrect result with __vector   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20041] CTFE incorrect result with __vector   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20041] CTFE incorrect result with __vector   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20041] CTFE incorrect result with __vector   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20111] asm VCVTPS2PH is not encoded correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20111] asm VCVTPS2PH is not encoded correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20111] asm VCVTPS2PH is not encoded correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20112] __vector casts don't do type conversions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20112] __vector casts don't do type conversions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20112] __vector casts don't do type conversions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20112] __vector casts don't do type conversions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20112] __vector casts don't do type conversions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20235] C++ ABI doesn't destruct struct arguments in the callee   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20394] "one path skips constructor" when exception is thrown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2051] interfaces should allow private methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20535] std.format: %b, %o, %x and %X on negative integers gives wrong result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20552] Deprecated Nullable.get warning with Appenders   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20607] [shared] static constructor & co can be called as regular function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20607] [shared] static constructor & co can be called as regular function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20607] [shared] static constructor & co can be called as regular function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20607] [shared] static constructor & co can be called as regular function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20621] Since DMD 2.087.0: 32 Bit Linux now uses XMM registers: SIGILL, Illegal instruction on intel Pentium III   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20652] extern(C++) doesn't seem to mangle the types in core.simd right   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20652] extern(C++) doesn't seem to mangle the types in core.simd right   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20652] extern(C++) doesn't seem to mangle the types in core.simd right   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20652] extern(C++) doesn't seem to mangle the types in core.simd right   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20652] extern(C++) doesn't seem to mangle the types in core.simd right   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20807] Missing documentation on SIMD opcodes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20821] Aliased template method confuses overload resolution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20821] Aliased template method confuses overload resolution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20834] pragma(inline, true) fails to inline simple functions. fails with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20837] [core.atomic] Provide MemoryOrder.con (consume) for atomicLoad   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21128] Update of dmd-master is stopped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21214] simd: wrong diagnostic with unsupported vectors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21214] simd: wrong diagnostic with unsupported vectors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21214] simd: wrong diagnostic with unsupported vectors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21214] simd: wrong diagnostic with unsupported vectors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21228] Templated toString silently ignored when it can't be instantiated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21239] Sort elements on the navigation bar by alphabetical order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21285] Delegate covariance broken between 2.092 and 2.094 (git master).   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21298] Missing error when overriding interface method without in contract with class method with contract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21298] Missing error when overriding interface method without in contract with class method with contract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21298] Missing error when overriding interface method without in contract with class method with contract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21325] Flags not set for ?: evaluation with floating point operands   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21408] Make std.math.nextUp and nextDown and nextafter work in CTFE for extended-precision real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21417] core.stdcpp.new_.cpp_delete unnecessarily requires destruction to be @nogc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21421] core.stdcpp.new_.cpp_delete does not work with classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21424] Variable is incremented twice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21438] Compiler segfault on static array in a struct at CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21439] install.sh is disabled for LDC on FreeBSD   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21441] New: TypeInfo_Enum.destroy and TypeInfo_Enum.postblit not calling destroy and postblit of base type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21441] TypeInfo_Enum.destroy and TypeInfo_Enum.postblit not calling destroy and postblit of base type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21441] TypeInfo_Enum.destroy and TypeInfo_Enum.postblit not calling destroy and postblit of base type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21441] TypeInfo_Enum.destroy and TypeInfo_Enum.postblit not calling destroy and postblit of base type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21442] Calling AA.remove from a destructor might lead to InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21442] Calling AA.remove from a destructor might lead to InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21442] Calling AA.remove from a destructor might lead to InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21442] New: Calling AA.remove from a destructor might lead to InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21443] New: scope (failure) with a return breaks safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21444] New: bad string concat in static assert message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21445] Indexing a tuple in a static array type suffix fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21445] New: Indexing a tuple in a static array type suffix fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21446] New: Cannot initialize a static array from a struct field of dynamic array type at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21447] New: Undocumented MS linker error LNK1377   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21447] Undocumented MS linker error LNK1377   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21447] Undocumented MS linker error LNK1377   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21447] Undocumented MS linker error LNK1377   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21447] Undocumented MS linker error LNK1377   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21448] Linker errors while building a Vibe.d app   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21448] Linker errors while building a Vibe.d app   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21448] New: Linker errors while building a Vibe.d ap   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21449] New: parser reject constructor call to const(SomeStructDecl)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21449] parser reject constructor call to const(SomeStructDecl)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21449] parser reject constructor call to const(SomeStructDecl)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21450] New: slice operator is not required for assignment to all elements of static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21451] __traits(compiles, ...) is wrong on overloaded templates instantiated with empty parens   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21451] New: __traits(compiles, ...) is wrong on overloaded templates instantiated with empty parens   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21452] isCallable erroneously returns false on function templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21452] isCallable erroneously returns false on function templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21452] New: isCallable erroneously returns false on function templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21453] New: Struct opCmp selection does not try rewrites   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21453] Struct opCmp selection does not reject ambiguous calls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21453] Struct opCmp selection does not try rewrites   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21454] New: PATH variable not updated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21455] New: Cannot call an overload aliased from a base struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21456] New: std.format does not accept enum member with string base type as template parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21457] New: std.functional.partial ignores function overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21458] missed oportunity to progapage final to its its aliased symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21458] missed oportunity to progapage final to its its aliased symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21458] missed oportunity to progapage final to its its aliased symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21458] missed opportunity to propagate `final` to aliased symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21458] New: missed oportunity to progapage final to its its aliased symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21459] @live owned pointer still alive at the end of @live function not detected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21459] New: @live owned pointer still alive at the end of @live function not detected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21460] implicit conversion between two unrelated enum is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21460] implicit conversion between two unrelated enum is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21460] implicit conversion between two unrelated enum is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21460] implicit conversion between two unrelated enum is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21460] New: implicit conversion between two unrelated enum is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21461] New: unittests with scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21461] unittests with scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21462] New: Unittests with visibility   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21462] Unittests with visibility   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21463] New: std.typecons.Proxy declares opCmp when it should not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21464] New: Superfluous module-level import affects attribute inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21464] Superfluous module-level import affects attribute inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21464] Superfluous module-level import affects attribute inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21464] Superfluous module-level import affects attribute inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21465] New: Static druntime accesses TLS after the thread is dead   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21465] Static druntime accesses TLS after the thread is dead   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21466] New: Calling an enum value result in confusing error message "No property X for type Y"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21467] Imported modules/packages are inaccessible outside the importing module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21467] Imported modules/packages are inaccessible outside the importing module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21467] New: Imported modules/packages are inaccessible outside the importing module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21468] Inscrutable template error when core.stdcpp.vector of a struct with a core.stdcpp.vector field is referenced before the struct's definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21468] Inscrutable template error when core.stdcpp.vector of a struct with a core.stdcpp.vector field is referenced before the struct's definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21468] Inscrutable template error when core.stdcpp.vector of a struct with a core.stdcpp.vector field is referenced before the struct's definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21468] New: Inscrutable template error when core.stdcpp.vector of a struct with a core.stdcpp.vector field is referenced before the struct's definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi16   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21469] New: ICE core.simd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21470] New: ICE core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21470] wrong codegen with core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21470] wrong codegen with core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21470] wrong codegen with core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21470] wrong codegen with core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21470] wrong codegen with core.simd when implementing _mm_set1_epi8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21471] New: Backend assertion triggered with `-checkation=context` and `-inline`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21472] New: `-checkaction=context` doesn't work with `tupleof`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21473] DMD enters infinite loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21473] New: DMD enters infinite loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O ("Illegal Instruction")   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O ("Illegal Instruction")   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O ("Illegal Instruction")   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O ("Illegal Instruction")   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O ("Illegal Instruction")   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O (Illegal Instruction)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O (Illegal Instruction)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O (Illegal Instruction)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O (Illegal Instruction)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] ICE with core.simd and -O (Illegal Instruction)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21474] New: ICE with core.simd and -O ("Illegal Instruction")   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21475] New: template 'this' parameter is incorrectly handled for 'alias this'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21475] template 'this' parameter is incorrectly handled for 'alias this'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21476] [codegen] 64 bit C ABI not followed when returning struct with 3 floats   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21476] [codegen] 64 bit C ABI not followed when returning struct with 3 floats   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21476] [codegen] 64 bit C ABI not followed when returning struct with 3 floats   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21476] New: [codegen] 64 bit C ABI not followed when returning struct with 3 floats   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21477] New: TypeInfo errors in betterC are cryptic   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21477] TypeInfo errors in betterC are cryptic   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21478] New: Setting a default value to an object field which is a 2D array may cause memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21479] New: ternary operator returns wrong val with ref return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21479] ternary operator returns wrong val with ref return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21479] ternary operator returns wrong val with ref return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21479] ternary operator returns wrong val with ref return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21479] ternary operator returns wrong val with ref return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21479] ternary operator returns wrong val with ref return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21479] ternary operator returns wrong val with ref return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21480] New: uncaught exceptions: stack trace truncated at NUL char   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21481] New: presence of function template prevents diagnostic   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21482] dynamic indexing into enum dynamic array at ctfe generates TypeInfo in betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21482] dynamic indexing into enum dynamic array at ctfe generates TypeInfo in betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21482] New: dynamic indexing into enum dynamic array at ctfe generates TypeInfo in betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21483] Error with timezone Europe/Moscow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21483] Error with timezone Europe/Moscow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21483] Error with timezone Europe/Moscow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21483] Error with timezone Europe/Moscow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21483] New: Error with timezone Europe/Moscow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21484] Infinite recursion in core.memory : GC.{get,set,clr}Attr(const scope void*...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21484] Infinite recursion in core.memory : GC.{get,set,clr}Attr(const scope void*...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21484] Infinite recursion in core.memory : GC.{get,set,clr}Attr(const scope void*...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21484] New: Infinite recursion in core.memory : GC.{get,set,clr}Attr(const scope void*...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21485] EH: Incomplete clean-up with -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21485] New: EH: Incomplete clean-up with -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21486] assert fail cgcod.d:1864 with simd and -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21486] assert fail cgcod.d:1864 with simd and -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21486] assert fail cgcod.d:1864 with simd and -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21486] assert fail cgcod.d:1864 with simd and -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21486] New: assert fail cgcod.d:1864 with simd and -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21487] New: ModuleInfo not found when compiling with -lib and -betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21488] New: Bundled 32-bit dlang tools (ddemangle, dustmite, rdmd) segfault on startup   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21489] Duplicated template instantiation using mixin inside alias declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21489] New: Duplicated template instantiation using mixin inside alias declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21490] Front end detection logic for SSE4.1 is failing when using -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21490] Front end detection logic for SSE4.1 is failing when using -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21490] New: Front end detection logic for SSE4.1 is failing when using -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21490] Optimizer can add SSE integer multiply for machines less than SSE4.1 which do not have it   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21490] Optimizer can add SSE integer multiply for machines less than SSE4.1 which do not have it   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21490] Optimizer can add SSE integer multiply for machines less than SSE4.1 which do not have it   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21491] New: Can't enumerate overload set from mixin templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21492] New: betterC: TypeInfo is generated for code guarded by if(__ctfe)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21493] Documentation broken hyperlink std.stdio   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21493] Documentation broken hyperlink std.stdio   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21493] New: Documentation broken hyperlink std.stdio   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21494] New: std.stdio.readf second example does not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21495] New: File.readf documentation does not state what what is returned.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21496] Implicitly nested templated functions can be assigned to function variables instead of delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21496] New: Implicitly nested templated functions can be assigned to function variables instead of delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21497] "Error: unknown" for generating struct using CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21497] New: "Error: unknown" for generating struct using CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21498] Functions with delegate parameter overloaded on attributes fail miserably   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21498] New: Functions with delegate parameter overloaded on attributes fail miserably   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21499] Backref mangling implementation causes OOM in some edge cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21499] Backref mangling implementation causes OOM in some edge cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21499] Backref mangling implementation causes OOM in some edge cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21499] Backref mangling implementation causes OOM in some edge cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21499] Backref mangling implementation causes OOM in some edge cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21499] New: Backref mangling implementation causes OOM in some edge cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21500] New: public import in mixin template in module a fails when module b import sa.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21500] public import in mixin template in module a fails when module b import sa.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21500] public import in mixin template in module a fails when module b imports a.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21500] public import in mixin template in module a fails when module b imports a.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21501] [REG 2.089.1] undefined identifier in package when using mixin and cyclic imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21501] [REG 2.089.1] undefined identifier in package when using mixin and cyclic imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21501] [REG 2.089.1] undefined identifier in package when using mixin and cyclic imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21501] [REG 2.089.1] undefined identifier in package when using mixin and cyclic imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21501] New: [REG 2.089.1] undefined identifier in package when using mixin and cyclic imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21502] New: __traits(getUnitTests) returns empty tuple for package modules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21503] Incorrect C main signature causes undefined behavior in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21503] New: Incorrect C main signature causes undefined behavior in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21504] New: Incorrect eponymous overload called by codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21505] New: Function alias reported as conflicting function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21506] New: _argptr gives wrong address, depending on number of arguments before varargs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21507] New: SysTime.toISOExtString is unusable for logging or consistent filename creation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21508] New: private class p in file p.d visible outside the file (module)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21509] New: alloca and exceptions causes wrong code.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21510] New: __traits(isSame, a, AliasSeq!a) returns true if "a" is a scalar   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21511] New: Uniqueness detection failed in non-template function with delegate parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21511] Uniqueness detection failed in non-template function with delegate parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21511] Uniqueness detection failed in non-template function with delegate parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21512] New: RedBlackTree!Tid treat any values as duplicated except for Tid.init   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21512] RedBlackTree!Tid treats any values as duplicated except for Tid.init   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21513] [Reg 2.094.1] Slice assignment segmentation fault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21513] New: [Reg 2.094.1] Slice assignment segmentation fault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21514] [ICE] cod1.d:4015: Assertion `retregs || !*pretregs' failed with -m32   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21514] [ICE] cod1.d:4015: Assertion `retregs || !*pretregs' failed with -m32   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21514] [ICE] cod1.d:4015: Assertion `retregs || !*pretregs' failed with -m32   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21514] [ICE] cod1.d:4015: Assertion `retregs || !*pretregs' failed with -m32   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21514] New: [ICE] cod1.d:4015: Assertion `retregs || !*pretregs' failed with -m32   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21515] extern(C) and extern(C++) returns creal in wrong order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21515] extern(C) and extern(C++) returns creal in wrong order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21515] New: extern(C) and extern(C++) returns creal in wrong order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21516] New: DMD windows download button not working in Chrome   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21517] New: Functions nested within `inout` functions can reinterpret `inout`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21518] New: delegates not checked for attribute match in const array parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21519] [CI] Code coverage pipeline is only ran for Linux x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21519] New: [CI] Code coverage pipeline is only ran for Linux x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3233] final switch could skip bounds checking in release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3904] Infer function type from an alias in a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4393] Very good dotProduct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5254] Low performance code with struct constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5254] Low performance code with struct constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6226] Switch with impossible cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7529] IFTI does not support template argument dependent template alias instances as parameter types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8046] simd.d needs some documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8046] simd.d needs some documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Thu Dec 31 12:24:33 UTC 2020
Archived on: Thu Dec 31 12:24:40 UTC 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...