The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

July 2020 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Jul 1 06:02:30 UTC 2020
Ending: Fri Jul 31 21:28:13 UTC 2020
Messages: 439

• [Issue 20997] New: Missing example of scope guard executing after return statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20996] -preview=dip1021 ICE given one liner throw program   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20998] New: error in static struct initialization causes wrong position for subsequent members, producing extra errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20999] New: autotester for Darwin_64_64 randomly times out and fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20999] autotester for Darwin_64_64 randomly times out and fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20998] error in static struct initialization causes wrong position for subsequent members, producing extra errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Runtime segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8904] ld error: `undefined reference to X`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21000] New: -preview=nosharedaccess precludes use of stdin,stdout,stderr   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21000] -preview=nosharedaccess precludes use of stdin,stdout,stderr   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21001] New: Private alias becomes public if used before declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21002] New: make std.exception enforce dip1008 agnostic   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21003] New: Lambda/delegate as default value for member function template argument "cannot be struct members"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8904] ld error: `undefined reference to X`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21003] Lambda/delegate as default value for member function argument "cannot be struct members"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21003] Lambda/delegate as default value for member function argument "cannot be struct members"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7273] Tuples conversion assign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7432] DMD allows variables to be declared as pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1793] Error on debug specification mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12504] Wrong 'cannot cover index range' error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21004] New: dmd segmentation fault with 'void' struct member array initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21005] New: Speed up hashOf for associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21005] Speed up hashOf for associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21006] New: core.internal.hash.bytesHash: in 64-bit builds use a 64-bit-oriented algorithm   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21007] New: DMD generates unnecessary prolog/epilog for trivial functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21007] DMD generates unnecessary prolog/epilog for trivial functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21006] core.internal.hash.bytesHash: in 64-bit builds use a 64-bit-oriented algorithm   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12504] Wrong 'cannot cover index range' error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21001] Private alias becomes public if used before declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21004] dmd segmentation fault with 'void' struct member array initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21004] dmd segmentation fault with 'void' struct member array initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19091] __traits(compiles) and error in templated structs leads to missing symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19091] __traits(compiles) and error in templated structs leads to missing symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19091] __traits(compiles) and error in templated structs leads to missing symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19091] __traits(compiles) and error in templated structs leads to missing symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14188] Add gcc-equivalent -MD options to dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16746] Please output Makefile-style depfiles for ninja and make   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18748] bt instruction with immediate offset uses 64-bit variant for 32-bit data   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18750] [Tracker] everything wrong with code generation for bt instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14188] Add gcc-equivalent -MD options to dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20014] [REG 2.084] -transition=all, -preview=all, -revert=all is invalid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20195] -preview=nosharedaccess has some access problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20909] .offsetof fails on forward reference of field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19277] storage class used in alias statement has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18750] [Tracker] everything wrong with code generation for bt instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20363] painting XMM registers as integers leads to codegen bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18407] debug should escape nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21008] New: dmd segfaults because of __traits(getMember, ...) and virtual function overriding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12504] Wrong 'cannot cover index range' error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20195] -preview=nosharedaccess has some access problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21009] New: CTFE string concatenation with -betterC fails with: Error: TypeInfo cannot be used with -betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21009] CTFE string concatenation with -betterC fails with: Error: TypeInfo cannot be used with -betterC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20195] -preview=nosharedaccess has some access problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21010] New: Windows symlinks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19277] storage class used in alias statement has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20989] Checking array.ptr causes safety error with -checkaction=context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21011] New: Variant and tuples by index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21011] Variant and tuples by index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6853] ParameterTypeTuple keeps storage class info but always compares equal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8173] rdmd -g --build-only main looses debug info   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9684] rdmd -lib <filename> produces corrupted file   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10068] mixin related bug: __HID22 is 0x00000001. causes exeption in nothrow code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10584] Unhelpful error default constructing nested class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10774] std.range.indexed RangeError when indexing string with std.range.recurrence!"n"(0)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11000] Static field type inference failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11056] synchronized methods are marked shared in ddoc output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11337] Ddoc ignores methods in static else block   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11456] works with -allinst but not without   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11645] struct with union considered unsafe only in second struct literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11860] with(expr) statement doesn't allow static methods on expr to be called with UFCS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11907] No undeclared identifier error in lambda alias argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11095] mixed in mixin templates not instantiated in templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2683] Cannot implement interface methods by alias   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3472] alias of a template cannot be used to override a function required by an interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11624] __trait(compiles) does not detect unimplemented interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12490] No "Error: , has no effect" Error for comma expression LHS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12521] std.getopt does not conform to documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12093] bad error message: Error: no [] operator overload for type Tuple!(string, string)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11645] struct with union considered unsafe only in second struct literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13438] Anonymous class instances created at compile-time get no vtable generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15199] Cannot Resolve Type When Calling stringof Property of a Template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11624] __trait(compiles) does not detect unimplemented interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19093] 'cannot alias itself' when using a template instantiation in a template parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20703] Segfault on missing import in template instantiation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11624] __trait(compiles) does not detect unimplemented interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20761] __traits(isSame) for alias tuples is broken and underspecified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15199] Cannot Resolve Type When Calling stringof Property of a Template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20761] __traits(isSame) for alias tuples is broken and underspecified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20990] Optimizer should move cold branches to the end of the function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21012] New: [REG2.062] Array equality fails with aggregates and > 3 levels of indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17124] dmd segfaults on __traits(getMember, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17124] dmd segfaults on __traits(getMember, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11393] [GC] GC realloc and free don't ignore interior pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21012] [REG2.062] Array equality fails with aggregates and > 3 levels of indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17124] dmd segfaults on __traits(getMember, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21013] New: dwarfeh: Comparing LSDA is too unreliable to determine if two exceptions can be merged   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21013] dwarfeh: Comparing LSDA is too unreliable to determine if two exceptions can be merged   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21013] dwarfeh: Comparing LSDA is too unreliable to determine if two exceptions can be merged   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21013] dwarfeh: Comparing LSDA is too unreliable to determine if two exceptions can be merged   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21008] dmd segfaults because of __traits(getMember, ...) and virtual function overriding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21008] dmd segfaults because of __traits(getMember, ...) and virtual function overriding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21008] dmd segfaults because of __traits(getMember, ...) and virtual function overriding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21013] dwarfeh: Comparing LSDA is too unreliable to determine if two exceptions can be merged   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19093] 'cannot alias itself' when using a template instantiation in a template parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18627] std.complex is a lot slower than builtin complex types at number crunching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21014] New: aa.byKeyValue, byKey, byValue very under-documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21015] New: aa.byKeyValue, byKey provide mutable reference access to keys   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21016] New: `Type.Field.init` is `typeof(Type.Field).init`, not the field initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12490] No "Error: , has no effect" Error for comma expression LHS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19272] scope class and const/immutable doesn't work together   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20169] Cannot allocate immutable class on the stack with scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17595] Fix warnings in PDF build & fail on specific warnings in the future   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21017] New: Tuple fails with inout and -allinst   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21017] Tuple fails with inout and -allinst   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21017] Tuple fails with inout and -allinst   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21017] Tuple fails with inout and -allinst   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21017] Tuple fails with inout and -allinst   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20991] Optimizer is not unlining various forms of simple loops   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17474] non-property being treated as a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21018] New: Assert fails glue.d(1560) using -allinst due to an error making it into codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21018] Assert fails glue.d(1560) using -allinst due to an error making it into codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21017] Tuple fails with inout and -allinst   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21018] Assert fails glue.d(1560) using -allinst due to an error making it into codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21018] Assert fails glue.d(1560) using -allinst due to an error making it into codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21019] New: Azure pipelines Windows_VisualD win32-ldc fails with Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21019] Azure pipelines Windows_VisualD win32-ldc fails with Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21019] Azure pipelines Windows_VisualD win32-ldc fails with Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21020] New: named import in with block masks local symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21020] named import in with block masks local symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20995] Range violation with -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20661] opEquals not recognized for AA key (take two)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21011] Variant and tuples by index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21019] Azure pipelines Windows_VisualD win32-ldc fails with Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20990] Optimizer should move cold branches to the end of the function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21021] New: sending a struct containing array using send/receive have problems.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21021] sending a struct containing array using send/receive have problems.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21021] sending a struct containing array using send/receive have problems.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20995] Range violation with -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20849] Option -L/noopttls not omitted for lld linker   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20251] `size_t.max` does not show value in debugger   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19359] Colourise type names and UDAs in editor.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20525] Navigation bar and parameter tooltip   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21021] std.variant confused by alias this when struct larger than maxDataSize   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21021] std.variant confused by alias this when struct larger than maxDataSize   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21022] New: std.range.only does not work with const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21021] std.variant confused by alias this when struct larger than maxDataSize   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21023] New: 64 bit BSWAP instruction not supported by code generator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21023] 64 bit BSWAP instruction not supported by code generator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21021] std.variant confused by alias this when struct larger than maxDataSize   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16213] CTFE internal error with static array $ as template argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21024] New: Corrupt New project list   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20862] Segfault on repeated GC.qalloc calls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21025] New: Segfault for function contract -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21026] New: add core.bitop.bswap(ushort)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21026] add core.bitop.bswap(ushort)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21025] Segfault for function contract -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21026] add core.bitop.bswap(ushort)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21026] add core.bitop.bswap(ushort)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21026] add core.bitop.byteswap(ushort)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21027] New: Backend: DMD use 'rep stosb' even for ulong arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1917] __traits(allMembers) does not return elements with specified protection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20863] Passing aggregate types into templates by alias drops qualifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21026] add core.bitop.byteswap(ushort)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21028] New: Cannot create new D project on user account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11480] `alias` template argument accepts `struct`, `class`, and `union` types and also loses all qualifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12576] problem with compile time struct field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15564] Bogus non local error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21028] Cannot create new D project on user account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20761] __traits(isSame) for alias tuples is broken and underspecified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21029] New: Remove __ArrayEq which the compiler no longer uses as of DMD PR #11212   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21029] Remove __ArrayEq which the compiler no longer uses as of DMD PR #11212   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21030] New: Reduce template function instantiations related to array equality   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21030] Reduce template function instantiations related to array equality   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21024] Corrupt New project list   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21029] Remove __ArrayEq which the compiler no longer uses as of DMD PR #11212   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21011] Variant and tuples by index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21024] Corrupt New project list   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21028] Cannot create new D project on user account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20761] __traits(isSame) for alias tuples is broken and underspecified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20963] wrong code for cast(double)anUlong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21031] New: Undefined behaviour: associative array literals with side effects.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21028] Cannot create new D project on user account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21028] Cannot create new D project on user account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21028] Cannot create new D project on user account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20014] [REG 2.084] -transition=all, -preview=all, -revert=all is invalid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20909] .offsetof fails on forward reference of field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20989] Checking array.ptr causes safety error with -checkaction=context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21032] New: Code coverage (-cov) with templates with nested functions of different types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20863] Passing aggregate types into templates by alias drops qualifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11577] Template std.typetuple.NoDuplicates removes const types for classes and structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20863] Passing aggregate types into templates by alias drops qualifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19089] Compiler crash for using struct &this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20980] std.bigint.BigInt: special case x & non-negative int to avoid unnecessary allocation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17720] Wrong code using vector extensions with different types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21033] New: enhancement: allow assign to field when the shared owing object has been locked already without cast   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21033] enhancement: allow assign to field when the shared owing object has been locked already without cast   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21034] New: concatenation with a string literal could also append the trailing null   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] New: wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21036] New: wrong code for non-pod types when compiled function with variadic static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21037] New: AVX code sometimes fails to set VEX prefix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21037] AVX code sometimes fails to set VEX prefix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21038] New: Wrong codegen when calling wcslen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21037] AVX code sometimes fails to set VEX prefix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21038] Wrong codegen when calling wcslen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21039] New: `alias this` returns 'null' for ref types when put into array initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21040] New: SIMD: illegal instruction using 32-byte operations on AVX   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21040] SIMD: illegal instruction using 32-byte operations on AVX   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21039] `alias this` returns 'null' for ref types when put into array initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21039] `alias this` returns 'null' for ref types when put into array initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21041] New: core.bitop.byteswap(ushort) should used ROL/ROR instead of XCHG   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21041] core.bitop.byteswap(ushort) should used ROL/ROR instead of XCHG   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20963] wrong code for cast(double)anUlong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21040] SIMD: illegal instruction using 32-byte operations on AVX   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21041] core.bitop.byteswap(ushort) should used ROL/ROR instead of XCHG   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21041] core.bitop.byteswap(ushort) should used ROL/ROR instead of XCHG   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21041] core.bitop.byteswap(ushort) should used ROL/ROR instead of XCHG   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21041] core.bitop.byteswap(ushort) should used ROL/ROR instead of XCHG   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21041] core.bitop.byteswap(ushort) should used ROL/ROR instead of XCHG   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21042] New: Darwin_64_64 fails autotester, but no clue in log file when CFGalwaysframe is turned off   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21042] Darwin_64_64 fails autotester, but no clue in log file when CFGalwaysframe is turned off   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21042] Darwin_64_64 fails autotester, but no clue in log file when CFGalwaysframe is turned off   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21043] New: Diagnostic for autogenerated opAssign needs to improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21044] New: [CTFE] Infinite loop in ForStatement::interpret   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21044] [CTFE] Infinite loop in ForStatement::interpret   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20628] Inherited In contracts should only check the most inherited function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21044] [CTFE] Infinite loop in ForStatement::interpret   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9352] Memory corruption in delegate called by struct dtor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20988] Missing error for negated array.ptr   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19517] Spurious compiler warning with const toHash and alias this classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12521] std.getopt does not conform to documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12521] std.getopt does not conform to documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11337] Ddoc ignores methods in static else block   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4393] Very good dotProduct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12521] std.getopt does not conform to documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20848] Bug in formatValueImpl   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19712] std.math.sin and cos cast float to real before evaluating.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19858] try with recursion fails to catch, possibly TCO gone too far   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12490] No "Error: , has no effect" Error for comma expression LHS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21036] wrong code for non-pod types when compiled function with variadic static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20433] Don't complain about implicit cast when an explicit cast would also be in error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21045] New: std.getopt: Support blank as separator of multiple values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20931] code which was executed at ctfe should be accounted for in coverage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21046] New: How to remove unittest when linking   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21047] New: Linker error: GOT load reloc does not point to a movq instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14814] ld: GOT load reloc does not point to a movq instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21047] Linker error: GOT load reloc does not point to a movq instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21036] wrong code for non-pod types when compiled function with variadic static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20594] [GCC ASM] Should the asm { } syntax be modernized for D2?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21048] New: Segfault by broken overrided method declaration and circular import   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21049] New: template inside template causes internal compile error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21049] template inside template causes internal compile error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19458] Speculatively-instantiated templates are incorrectly cached   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21050] New: __traits(getOverloads) for templates returns incorrect symbol for the first overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21046] How to remove unittest when linking   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21051] New: Test Suite C++ interop tests / Run (ubuntu-16.04, g++-9) failed with 'Store Artifacts'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21051] Test Suite C++ interop tests / Run (ubuntu-16.04, g++-9) failed with 'Store Artifacts'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21052] New: buildkite ldc-developers/ldc log file contains not a clue what it is attempting to do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21052] buildkite ldc-developers/ldc log file contains not a clue what it is attempting to do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21053] New: Test Suite run.d is built with compiler under test, must be build with bootstrap dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21053] Test Suite run.d is built with compiler under test, must be build with bootstrap dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21054] New: Test Suite test/run.d has no documentation on how the dmd under test is specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21054] Test Suite test/run.d has no documentation on how the dmd under test is specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16288] splitter() that doesn't eat sentinels   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16288] splitter() that doesn't eat sentinels   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14224] std.range.chunks variable chunk size   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21055] New: core.stdc.stdarg is not @nogc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21055] core.stdc.stdarg is not @nogc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20422] confusing error "new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class objects, not int[]'s"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15103] Improve declaration / initialization syntax error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21056] New: Test Suite autotester FreeBSD_32 Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21056] Test Suite autotester FreeBSD_32 Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21051] Test Suite C++ interop tests / Run (ubuntu-16.04, g++-9) failed with 'Store Artifacts'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21052] buildkite ldc-developers/ldc log file contains not a clue what it is attempting to do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21050] __traits(getOverloads) for templates returns incorrect symbol for the first overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21024] Corrupt New project list   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21028] Cannot create new D project on user account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21057] New: getopt, function setter for a long option receive the key, not the value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21057] getopt, function setter for a long option receive the key, not the value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21057] getopt, function setter for a long option receive the key, not the value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21057] getopt, function setter for a long option receive the key, not the value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21058] New: __traits(getOverloads) forgets with with third argument or if first overload is a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21058] __traits(getOverloads) forgets "this" with third argument or if first overload is a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21058] __traits(getOverloads) forgets "this" with third argument or if first overload is a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21058] __traits(getOverloads) forgets "this" with third argument or if first overload is a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14458] very slow ubyte[] assignment (dmd doesn't use memset)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21027] Backend: DMD use 'rep stosb' even for ulong arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14458] very slow ubyte[] assignment (dmd doesn't use memset)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20422] confusing error "new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class objects, not int[]'s"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21027] Backend: DMD use 'rep stosb' even for ulong arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 497] frontend: 64-bit cleanup of sprintf buffer sizes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21027] Backend: DMD use 'rep stosb' even for ulong arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21059] New: install.sh: posix_terminal returns false on Linux Mint 20   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21059] install.sh: posix_terminal returns false on Linux Mint 20   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21060] New: ICE in semantic, at d/dmd/dstruct.c:1224   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21060] ICE in semantic, at d/dmd/dstruct.c:1224   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21059] install.sh: posix_terminal returns false on Linux Mint 20   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21060] ICE in semantic, at d/dmd/dstruct.c:1224   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21060] ICE in semantic, at d/dmd/dstruct.c:1224   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21059] install.sh: posix_terminal returns false on Linux Mint 20   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21061] New: Bad error: function D main is a nested function and cannot be accessed from reduce   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14739] Immutable alias to template triggers dmd assert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19024] [REG 2.081-beta] AssertError at dmd/dsymbolsem.d(4317): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21060] ICE in semantic, at d/dmd/dstruct.c:1224   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21060] ICE in semantic, at d/dmd/dstruct.c:1224   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14458] very slow ubyte[] assignment (dmd doesn't use memset)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14458] very slow ubyte[] assignment (dmd doesn't use memset)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21062] New: Compiler produces wildly different diagnostics based on variable names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21062] Compiler produces wildly different diagnostics based on variable names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21062] Diagnostic for 'synchronized' used as a variable name should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21062] Compiler produces wildly different diagnostics based on variable names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19663] On x86_64 the fabs intrinsic should use SSE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21063] New: getLinkage is wrong for forward reference extern(C++) class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21063] getLinkage is wrong for forward reference extern(C++) class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19663] On x86_64 the fabs intrinsic should use SSE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9490] 'this' is not found when expression is in parentheses   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14458] very slow ubyte[] assignment (dmd doesn't use memset)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21064] New: setCookieJar/caInfo in std.net.curl cannot handle the non-ASCII paths   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12223] __traits(getMember,...) needed for aliases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21059] install.sh: posix_terminal returns false on Linux Mint 20   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21063] getLinkage is wrong for forward reference extern(C++) class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 483] ICE-invalid with tuple. mangleof.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14936] Dividing by a power of 2 slow on 32bit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 405] typeof in TemplateParameterList causes compiletime segmentfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14936] Dividing by a power of 2 slow on 32bit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21065] New: the new operator should lower to a template function call in object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21065] the new operator should lower to a template function call in object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21065] the new operator should lower to a template function call in object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21062] Compiler produces wildly different diagnostics based on variable names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21065] the new operator should lower to a template function call in object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21065] the new operator should lower to a template function call in object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21024] Corrupt New project list   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21066] New: Druntime SIGSEGV / SIGBUS unittest signal handler should emit the stack trace for all threads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21066] Druntime SIGSEGV / SIGBUS unittest signal handler should emit the stack trace for all threads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21066] Druntime SIGSEGV / SIGBUS unittest signal handler should emit the stack trace for all threads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21067] New: Tupleof of struct returned by function with string field lazily passed to function, itself lazily passed to another function, causes runtime OOM.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21067] Tupleof of struct returned by function with string field lazily passed to function, itself lazily passed to another function, causes runtime OOM.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21068] New: Cannot sort a RandomAccessFinite range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21069] New: Variant.get!Variant segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18919] __FILE__ and __LINE__ should work when used in default argument expressions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19663] On x86_64 the fabs intrinsic should use SSE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19663] On x86_64 the fabs intrinsic should use SSE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21070] New: -profile=gc makes the program much slower   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21070] -profile=gc makes the program much slower   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19548] [REG 2.080] Missing reference to _D6object__T14__switch_errorZQrFNaNbNiNfAyamZv   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21071] New: Undefined reference error when converting strings to enums in static switch.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21072] New: Segfault reassigning a variable to result of external C function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21072] Segfault reassigning a variable to result of external C function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21072] Segfault reassigning a variable to result of external C function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21073] New: Rebindable does not work when class has alias this to inout property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21074] New: const lost in mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21074] const lost in mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21075] New: Finalize lowering a < b for class and interface objects to .object.__cmp   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21072] Segfault reassigning a variable to result of external C function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21074] const lost in mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21076] New: Tracker for issues discussed at online D conf July 2020   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20633] Struct literals order of evaluation is definition dependent, not call dependent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21076] Tracker for issues discussed at online D conf July 2020   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21077] New: Order of evaluation of associative array is compiler-dependent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21076] Tracker for issues discussed at online D conf July 2020   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21078] New: static if(is(T IDENT)) introduces IDENT beyond static if's scpe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21074] const lost in mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21078] static if(is(T IDENT)) introduces IDENT beyond static if's scpe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21078] static if(is(T IDENT)) introduces IDENT beyond static if's scpe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21074] const lost in mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21079] New: Can't "step" into interface methods in gdb   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21080] New: [REG 2.080] Cannot initialize immutable variable after switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21074] const lost in mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21080] [REG 2.080] Cannot initialize immutable variable after switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21058] __traits(getOverloads) forgets "this" with third argument or if first overload is a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7033] File.rawWrite is slow on Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21081] New: Test Suite: Azure pipelines heisenbug timeout   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21081] Test Suite: Azure pipelines heisenbug timeout   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21078] static if(is(T IDENT)) introduces IDENT beyond static if's scpe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21082] New: Testsuite fails on OSX (runnable/test16096.sh with asserts on)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21083] New: Failed to compile on MacOS 10.15.3   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21083] Linker Failed on MacOS 10.15.3   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21084] New: Test Suite ci/circleci Heisenbug failed to download script install.sh   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21084] Test Suite ci/circleci Heisenbug failed to download script install.sh   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21085] New: [glue] Only 9999 "hidden identifiers" can be generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21085] [glue] Only 9999 "hidden identifiers" can be generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21083] Linker Failed on MacOS 10.15.3   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21085] [glue] Only 9999 "hidden identifiers" can be generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21086] New: Dead docs link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16657] alias this interacts with generated opCmp and opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21087] New: refRange() does not work with ranges which have internal const fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21088] New: std.meta.staticMap no longer works for typeid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21088] std.meta.staticMap no longer works for typeid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21088] std.meta.staticMap no longer works for typeid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21089] New: With vm.overcommit_memory=0, DMD can't link if it uses more than half the total (ram+swap) memory in the system.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21089] With vm.overcommit_memory=0, DMD can't link if it uses more than half the total (ram+swap) memory in the system.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15103] Improve declaration / initialization syntax error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21050] __traits(getOverloads) for templates returns incorrect symbol for the first overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21088] std.meta.staticMap no longer works for typeid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21090] New: Test Suite: C++ interop tests heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21090] Test Suite: C++ interop tests heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14607] dmd crashes intermittently when building in 32 bit mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21090] Test Suite: C++ interop tests heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21091] New: [ICE] Segmentation fault: module mod is in file 'mod.d' which cannot be read   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21091] [ICE] Segmentation fault: module mod is in file 'mod.d' which cannot be read   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19210] Poor error message for `return` function parameter that is not `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21091] [ICE] Segmentation fault: Module::importAll(Scope*) (this=0x0, prevsc=0x0) at dmd/dmodule.d:1124   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21092] New: [ICE] Segmentation fault in ExpressionPrettyPrintVisitor::visit(CommaExp*) at dmd/hdrgen.d:2293   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21092] [ICE] Segmentation fault in ExpressionPrettyPrintVisitor::visit(CommaExp*) at dmd/hdrgen.d:2293   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21092] [ICE] Segmentation fault in ExpressionPrettyPrintVisitor::visit(CommaExp*) at dmd/hdrgen.d:2293   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21093] New: [ICE] AssertError at dmd/optimize.d(691): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21093] [ICE] AssertError at dmd/optimize.d(691): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21093] [ICE] AssertError at dmd/optimize.d(691): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21093] [ICE] AssertError at dmd/optimize.d(691): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21093] [ICE] AssertError at dmd/optimize.d(691): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21094] New: [REG2.078] Array equality for struct with class member and opCast and alias this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21094] [REG2.078] Array equality for struct with class member and opCast and alias this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21095] New: [ICE] AssertError at dmd/expressionsem.d(5015): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21095] [ICE] AssertError at dmd/expressionsem.d(5015): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21096] New: [ICE] Segmentation fault in dmd.hdrgen.sizeToBuffer at dmd/hdrgen.d:3153   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21095] [ICE] AssertError at dmd/expressionsem.d(5015): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15525] SEGV running semantic analysis on non-root decl that has errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21095] [ICE] AssertError at dmd/expressionsem.d(5015): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21091] [ICE] Segmentation fault: Module::importAll(Scope*) (this=0x0, prevsc=0x0) at dmd/dmodule.d:1124   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21097] New: [REG2.083] Stack exhaustion upon large struct .destroy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21097] [REG2.083] Stack exhaustion upon large struct .destroy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21097] [REG2.083] Stack exhaustion upon large struct .destroy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21098] New: poor diagnostic when trying to assign a `string` to a `char*`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21098] poor diagnostic when trying to assign a string literal to a `char*`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21035] wrong code when uses struct's methods of .init value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17720] Wrong code using vector extensions with different types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21097] [REG2.083] Stack exhaustion upon large struct .destroy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19210] Poor error message for `return` function parameter that is not `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20624] [REG2.088] AA access gives wrong deprecation message.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20624] [REG2.088] AA access gives wrong deprecation message.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15103] Improve declaration / initialization syntax error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Fri Jul 31 21:28:13 UTC 2020
Archived on: Fri Jul 31 21:28:21 UTC 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...