Bill Baxter wrote: > Frits van Bommel wrote: > >> Though I must admit that the unary use of 'is' had me a bit confused >> for a while when I first tried to use it, but I don't think that was >> because of the binary use... > > There's a unary 'is' operator? Well, there's an 'is()' :) http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/expression.html#IsExpression