Move DWT2 repository - github or bitbucket?

torhu no at spam.invalid
Mon Aug 15 05:36:32 PDT 2011

On 15.08.2011 15:28, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
> 15.08.2011 9:29, Jacob Carlborg:
>>  On 2011-08-14 22:20, torhu wrote:
>>>  On 11.08.2011 19:58, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>>>  I'm planning to move the DWT2 repository to either github or bitbucket.
>>>>  Which one would you prefer?
>>>  Git seems to require a Unix shell to work on Windows. Which is one of
>>>  the things that make me think that git and Windows is not a match made
>>>  in heaven. It's a bit like having a crossplatform project that uses
>>>  Microsoft's C++ extensions, and requires linux contributors to run MSVC
>>>  through Wine to be able to build it. In other words, I would prefer
>>>  Bitbucket.
>>>  But I don't expect to make big contributions, so it's not going to
>>>  matter much for the project.
>>  I have been thinking the same myself. I just haven't figured out how
>>  much of a problem it really is.
> Sorry, but I don't see the problem. There is TortoiseGit with very good
> Windows explorer integration:
> And, AFAIK, it's an official git Windows GUI at "Download Git" section:

Some of us don't want to install yet another shell extension.  And I 
prefer working on the command line, much quicker and simpler.

More information about the Digitalmars-d-dwt mailing list