Survey: Can we drop support for LLVM versions prior to 3.5?
Johan Engelen via digitalmars-d-ldc
digitalmars-d-ldc at puremagic.com
Fri Apr 10 05:00:23 PDT 2015
I am using LLVM 3.6 and trunk (I build LLVM myself).
The only reason I have builds for 3.4 and 3.5 is to fix backwards
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 05:56:36 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> Because the LLVM API is not stable this broad support becomes
> more and more a burden. It is also likely that this set of LLVM
> libraries will not be supported by the new Travis container
> (which I like to use because of more RAM and CPU cores).
Is anyone actively working on having green Travis build for LLVM
More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc