C++ binding issues with "overloading" pragma mangle

[David Nadlinger via digitalmars-d-ldc]

On 22 Jun 2017, at 15:53, ParticlePeter via digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:
> Is this some precaution or is unique mangling really necessary? If 
> not, could this requirement be removed?

It is merely a precaution – the requirement could be removed by having 
LDC insert bitcasts as appropriate on the LLVM IR level.

  — David