Question about win32, windows.d, user32 and kernel32

[Stewart Gordon]

nobody wrote:
> Don Clugston wrote:
<snip>
>> I believe the windows headers that come with D are the ones which were 
>> needed for Empire to compile. I think they were expanded a bit beyond 
>> that, but it explains why the selection of functions is a bit odd; 
>> they were added as required.
> 
> That would certainly make sense. Thanks!

Indeed, std.c.windows.windows doesn't correspond to any particular 
standard Windows header.  It's just Walter's practice of adding stuff as 
and when he needs it.

However, it appears that Empire was written around 
std.c.windows.windows, rather than the other way round.  In particular, 
for some reason I never established the old Empire D code worked around 
the (since fixed) broken declarations of DLGPROC et al.

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS- 
PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.