Lutger lutger.blijdestijn at
Sun Nov 19 04:19:14 PST 2006

nobody_ wrote:
>> Do you *absolutely* need 1000 updates per second?  What are you doing that 
>> requires such precise timing?
> Yep, eyetracking :)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've gathered about timing you 
can't have any such guarantees about getting 1ms updates on a 
non-realtime OS (such as windows xp), with or without threading.

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list