spam at spam.spam
Sun Nov 19 06:04:03 PST 2006
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've gathered about timing you
> can't have any such guarantees about getting 1ms updates on a non-realtime
> OS (such as windows xp), with or without threading.
There are alot of microseconds in a millisecond ;)
If you do countperiod/microseconds and get lucky you even get your cpuspeed.
Remove as many services as possible and its possible to get really close to
realtime at a millisecond level.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn