Tango BitArray Initialization
sean at f4.ca
Sun Feb 11 19:41:48 PST 2007
Colin Huang wrote:
> John Reimer Wrote:
>> (The last line could be legal if an opCall were implemented.)
> Even if an opCall overload were in place, I doubt that the last line would
> compile. It certainly didn't last time I tried (I'm using gdc 0.22 on
> I may be wrong on this, of course.
> In fact, I've been wanting to be able to do that for quite some time now, so I
> can use structs like stack-allocated objects in C++ (syntax-wise, at
> least). If it actually works, pls give some examples. thx
I don't think this is legal in D. In fact, the syntax is a huge problem
in C++ because the parser often can't distinguish between a variable
decl and a function prototype, and function prototypes take precedence.
It may be uglier, but:
BitArray b = BitArray( 1, 0, 1 );
is better than:
BitArray b( 1, 0, 1 );
I only wish that the syntax worked for all stack variables. ie.
int x = int( 1 );
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn