Exception Handling, Scope and Destructor questions

[Deewiant]

Kirk McDonald wrote:
> orgoton wrote:
>> Lastly, the catch() does not need to have a scope, yes? something like
>> catch(Exception e) ProcessGeneric(); in summary of the code above?
> 
> Yes, this is allowed.
> 

Incorrect. try doesn't need it, but catch does, and I would expect finally to,
as well.

try foo();
catch bar(); // doesn't work

try foo();
catch { bar(); } // fine