Exception Handling, Scope and Destructor questions

Deewiant deewiant.doesnotlike.spam at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 10:20:50 PST 2007

Kirk McDonald wrote:
> orgoton wrote:
>> Lastly, the catch() does not need to have a scope, yes? something like
>> catch(Exception e) ProcessGeneric(); in summary of the code above?
> Yes, this is allowed.

Incorrect. try doesn't need it, but catch does, and I would expect finally to,
as well.

try foo();
catch bar(); // doesn't work

try foo();
catch { bar(); } // fine

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list