Exception Handling, Scope and Destructor questions

[Kirk McDonald]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Kirk McDonald" <kirklin.mcdonald at gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:eqqjbc$ebp$1 at digitalmars.com...
> 
>>> Lastly, the catch() does not need to have a scope, yes? something like 
>>> catch(Exception e) ProcessGeneric(); in summary of the code above?
>> Yes, this is allowed.
> 
> Wow, you learn something new every day :)  Never knew you could make 
> try/catch/finally statements without the braces.  Huh.  I'll have to add 
> that to MiniD. 
> 
> 

C++'s treatment of this topic is one of its many freakish features:

http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1429017

-- 
Kirk McDonald
http://kirkmcdonald.blogspot.com
Pyd: Connecting D and Python
http://pyd.dsource.org