More granular performance profiling?

[0ffh]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> Short of splitting the interpreter function into several smaller functions 
> to profile it, is there any way to get more granular performance profiling? 

Don't you mean less granular?
Does more or less make much sense for granular, anyway?
But as I understand, you want smaller granules, which I
think makes it less granular..... :)

Happy granning, 0ffh