More granular performance profiling?

[Mike Parker]

0ffh wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> Short of splitting the interpreter function into several smaller 
>> functions to profile it, is there any way to get more granular 
>> performance profiling? 
> 
> Don't you mean less granular?
> Does more or less make much sense for granular, anyway?
> But as I understand, you want smaller granules, which I
> think makes it less granular..... :)
> 
> Happy granning, 0ffh
> 

Think of "more granular" as breaking something up into more granules. 
"more" and "less" refer to the number of granules, not the size of them :)