Is there a reason for default-int?

Don nospam at
Mon Dec 28 22:37:42 PST 2009

Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Apart from C legacy, is there a reason to assume anything we don't know 
> what
> is, is an int? Shouldn't the compiler instead say 'unknown type' or 
> something
> else that makes sense?

There's now an Error type in the compiler. It's gradually filtering its 
way through the compiler.

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list