Is there a reason for default-int?
none at anon.com
Tue Dec 29 18:54:14 PST 2009
> Simen kjaeraas wrote:
>> Apart from C legacy, is there a reason to assume anything we don't
>> is, is an int? Shouldn't the compiler instead say 'unknown type' or
>> else that makes sense?
> There's now an Error type in the compiler. It's gradually filtering
> its way through the compiler.
ok. Can we s/gradually/rapidly/ ?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn