@nogc with assoc array

[Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Tuesday, 17 February 2015 at 00:00:54 UTC, FG wrote:
> Yes, they would be in TLS. I know exceptions in general are a 
> complex problem, therefore I limited the comment only to 
> errors, because forbidding the use of `aa[key]` in @nogc seemed 
> odd (although I do think that `aa.get(key, default)` and `key 
> in aa` are superior to `aa[key]`). I have seen a few examples 
> of Exception chaining, but not Error chaining, and since Error 
> trumps Exception, whatever else was raised was of less 
> importance to me, so I didn't give much thought to that.

I'm not sure what you mean by Errors?  Are you talking about 
asserts?