std.stdio.writeln

[Meta via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, 9 March 2015 at 22:00:46 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> i remember that deprecation was rejected. maybe this is false 
> memory,
> though.
>
> btw, there are legit uses of comma, in c-style `for`, for 
> example. this
> should be left intact, i think (oh, can c-style `for` be 
> deprecated too?!
> ).

I think the last time there was a big discussion about this 
everyone agreed that the comma operator in a for loop was 
acceptable.