Maxime's micro allocation benchmark much faster ?

[weaselcat via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> Trying on a different beefier machine with 2.066 and 2.067 
> release versions installed:
>
> 1mm allocations:
> 2.066: 0.844s
> 2.067: 0.19s
>
> 10mm allocations
>
> 2.066: 1m 17.2 s
> 2.067: 0m  1.15s
>
> So numbers were ballpark right before, and allocation on this 
> micro-benchmark much faster.

Wow! props to the people that worked on the GC.