is it regression?

Daniel Kozak kozzi11 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 28 15:00:07 UTC 2018


I would say it is a still regression, but I agree with you, that it should
not work on the first place.

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:28 PM, bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 13:38:56 UTC, drug wrote:
>
>> done https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18539
>>
>
> I would argue that isn't a regression and that you __should__ use the .get
> and that it's not a workaround, because nullable's shouldn't be treated
> like that type they encapsulate.
>
> std.math members such as approxEqual shouldn't have to take nullable into
> account.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20180228/3df38ee6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list