Possible dmd 2.078 regression ?

[Basile B.]

On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency 
>>> is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine 
>>> before.
>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>
> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
> i'm digging right now.

digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is 
untestable.
digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
object.Exception at bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!