Possible dmd 2.078 regression ?

[timotheecour]

On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency 
>>>> is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine 
>>>> before.
>>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>>
>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
>> i'm digging right now.
>
> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) 
> is untestable.
> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
> digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
> object.Exception at bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!

please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/