Possible dmd 2.078 regression ?
Basile B.
b2.temp at gmx.com
Fri Jan 26 22:15:15 UTC 2018
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 21:52:30 UTC, timotheecour wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the
>>>>> dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It
>>>>> worked fine before.
>>>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>>>
>>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
>>> i'm digging right now.
>>
>> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1)
>> is untestable.
>> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
>> digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
>> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
>> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
>> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
>> object.Exception at bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!
>
> please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/
Yeah i did.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18234
I saw a related (but not similar) thing yesterday. the guy has to
pass a dummy.d file for linking to succeed.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list