OK, I'm stumped on this one: dstep, struct, mixin, bitfields

[Jacob Carlborg]

On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 09:55:44 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:

> I am guessing you mean against DStep rather than D :-)

Yes :)

> Though clearly T and I would prefer version not to be a D 
> keyword.
>
> I suspect I have seen one place where DStep has turned version 
> into version_ where version was a variable name. In this case 
> "version" was a string used to create a bitfield using a 
> mixin(bitfield!(…)) construct. Is that likely easy to fix?

Yes. It's not a string literal in the C code. The identifier 
should be renamed before it's added to the call to "bitfield".

--
/Jacob Carlborg